Hello all,

There is an interview in newspaper :Hardselling Homeopathy: with Dr. Prasanta Banerji (Homeopath Research Foundation) a vetran homeopath from Kolkata(India) with several years research esp. to fight cancerous tumors whose 10 completely cured cases are said to be varified by National Cancer Institue of the US government. He replied to one question as under:-

Q: Are there recent modifications in the treatments through homeopathy?

A: " Let me point out that with the passage of time after Dr Samuel Hahnemann's assumptions, the medical science as a whole has improved tremendously. We do not undertake the old method of Like Cures Like in which one has to ask very elaborate questions for hours to the patient to select a medicine. After so many years of experiance, we deviated from the old method of treatment and formulated specific treatment for specific diseases--which is not in accordance with the origional homeopathic theories. We are treating patients with homeopathic medicines but with a new approach of diagnostic treatment, by taking help of available scientific detection methods while utilising the benefits of all pathological tests and reports. Thus, whether I treat various cancer cases, or many other types of cases, I undertake dignostic treatment. The treatments of many surgical cases also are well within the scope of homeopathic treatment and medicine alone."

I have questions in this respect:-

1. Is it correct & worth to practice alike it?

2. Is it legal to practice alike it??

3. Are regular studies in homeopathy "Classical or Modern or Both based" and if homeopths are allowed to do any changes/modifications without any control of any regulatory body in consideration of its least side/adverse effects?

Best wishes.

__________________
Homeopathic & Biochemic system existed because Drs.Hahnemann & Schuessler thought differently.
Successful people don't do different things, they do things differently..S.Kh.