Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David Little
Dear Colleagues,
As I understand it Peter Chappell claims his remedy is a "new technology" or designer remedy. My reservation is the apparent lack of full discloser about the nature of the remedy. This is not in line with medical norms and consumer acts. Full disclosure the manufacturing and contains is standard practice. I find it ethically very hard to suggest something when it is not clear what it really is and how it is made? It is a trade secret. My question is why all the secrecy???
Sincerely, David Little
|
I was not trying to put down Homeopathy. I think individual Homeopathy is magnificent, profound, the deepest sort of therapy and fantastic when it is achieved.
I used 'fog' because I observed, amongst a group of homeopaths in a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome trial we did together, say almost to a woman/man, that after my CFS remedy they could now see the individual remedy needed, after years of trying and not succeeding. Fog seemed to me the situation.
I dont declare the full process for this reason. If I do I must make it full and complete and accurate and exact etc. Otherwise others could further investigate it and patent the bits I get wrong, therby limiting all use. A GM patentee wanted to to offer Bangadesh a vitamin A enriched rice, apparently they are short on Vit A. He had the main patent. He wanted to give it for free. But there were 70 other surrounding patents which inhibited him from this act.
To declare the process fully requires the same skills as filing a full patent, and for that it requires a lot more research by me than I have the time and money for, as well as some very skilled patent lawyer input, something costing a lot of money. Currently for 3 years I have existed on donations. They dont cover research or lawyers. I dont see this changing. PC1 is however, the very best treatment for AIDS and could still be instrumental in stopping the dying in Africa. My CFS remedy appears to out perform any treatment of any kind by a very big margin. Patients dont ask or get very concerned.
There is a little aside here. You ask what is it? But what is say Aurum? Gold. But what is gold really? At some point you dont know. This applies to everything. We like things in boxes we think we understand, but do we really know what anything really is?
my web sitewww.peterchappell.net is my web site as well as aids-heal.com
I hold to my views on potency. It is primative the way its used. I know thats not polite, but its accuarate.
With respect and in friendship
Peter