View Single Post
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 2nd September 2004, 05:55 AM
Kenneth Salls
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Peter Chappell - PC1 HIV/AIDS `1

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Little
As I understand it Peter Chappell claims his remedy is a "new technology" or designer remedy. My reservation is the apparent lack of full discloser about the nature of the remedy. This is not in line with medical norms and consumer acts. Full disclosure the manufacturing and contains is standard practice. I find it ethically very hard to suggest something when it is not clear what it really is and how it is made? It is a trade secret.
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Little
My question is why all the secrecy???

Could it possibly be because...if something cannot be independently duplicated/confirmed (such as "cold fusion")...it's...a hoax?

Last edited by jonh; 2nd September 2004 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote