What potency is it?
I prefer to avoid potency, as it’s a very unsatisfactory subject with no satisfying conclusions. Also the way homeopaths relate to potency is primitive

Designed remedies are a lot more powerful in my experience, and complete, so they do the job required.

I then just use repetition until the action needed is complete. This means stopping at the aggravation or keeping going through it, as experience dictates, or using it at every sign of relapse or as needed.

As I experience it, potency is not then a consideration. If the remedy stops acting, it’s more likely it’s the wrong remedy or something basic is wrong, like the patient has stopped taking it.

Below are some of my other reservations about potency.
• The effectiveness of a remedy is due to its potential (vital force), its healing currents, its power, its frequency domains, and its inner harmony to state just a few parameters. This is equivalent to volts, amps, power, frequency and coherence when describing electricity. To use just volts to describe electricity is very limiting and very incomplete. Likewise using potency to describe remedy strength is very incomplete.


• Potency is not a level playing field. When Puff Adder is potentised, that’s hundreds of times more toxic than Lycopodium in the natural state, how could it be that they are equal strengths? Where is the baseline in potency? As far as I can see it does not exist. There is no equal starting point.


• I feel fairly certain that the energy available from the remedy does not increase by potency. The volts=potency increases, but the power does not. I also feel intuitively that power is more important than potency.

• Maybe other healing is needed to unblock the way for any remedy that is truly indicated but not working, its not potency. It could be some sacral/cranial adjustment for example is needed.

• Often homeopaths say the remedy stopped working so they raised or lowered the potency, but that could be just the effect of repetition.

• When my new remedy is used for Chronic Fatigue for example, the first response of the homeopaths is that ‘the remedy’ the patient needs is now clear. With so many ceeds (chronic effects of epidemic diseases) - there are as many as there are epidemic diseases, homeopathy and all individual healing is like working through fog. Treating the disease is clearing the fog.

• We use any impediment to say it’s the wrong potency. But is that our real experience? Or is it that after the remedy works, then stops, that often no other potency works?

• Could it also be that the way the remedy is made is insufficient, that the potentisation process has not revealed the full power of the remedy? I think my new remedy making procedure create full power remedies.

• Could it be true that if the remedy is made at full power, any potency is effective?

While the above is by no means a conclusive set of arguments, I hope I have sown the seeds of doubt in the idea that potency is understood.

With these designer remedies I think the power is there, and potentisation could and will reduce that. Certainly I have feedback to that effect. I can’t be sure, but since it’s a top down approach, from spirit into matter, whereas potency is a bottom up approach, from matter into spirit, I think this new approach starts at the strongest energy and potentisation does weaken it.
This is for two reasons, maybe more. First, potentisation does not, in my brief clinical experience with these new remedies, reveal the full spectrum of the potentised remedies. Secondly, I don’t think potentisation is optimised in any way and must therefore be well below is possibilities. I think potentisation is incomplete and inadequate as a process. This can easily to demonstrated by using one of my new remedies in a well defined case where a potentised remedy has failed in any potency, yet is still indicated.
Peter Chappell