dear david

you wrote :-

This may be what makes the Cs so effective
in crisis, acute diseases and the during the primary symptoms of the
chronic miasms. The C potencies are also quite effective in chronic
diseases that start with a crisis and then progress fairly quickly into
functional states and the first states of pathology

- i did not understand the above lines clealry.

- i think LMs work fine in acute crisis and also chronic miasmatic states. why say C is better here ? ( i am not against C potency and do understand the need to use all available poslogy strategies - LM as well as C. just want to understand what you mean)

- dr harimohun chowdhury did ONLY LMs and he had no problems treating sooo many cases in the 25 or so years of his practice. he did all acutes / chronic etc with LMs.

- i would use low potency Cs (6C, 12 C, 30 C) only if a LM 0/1 aggravates as LM0/1 is more strong than 30C. apart from this is do not see any need for Cs.
i do keep 30C remedies in my travel kits.

dr manish agarwala