otherhealth.com - View Single Post

Hans Weitbrecht · #23 (**permalink**) 15th June 2004, 07:10 PM

Dear Members

As there is no longer any doubt, that Rickie’s and Divina’s advices are not in line with the rules and regulations governing homeopathy, I will now come to the initial question.
In the first post it was written:

>> I was given it following an EAV consultation which showed my triple warmer meridian was low and required a miasm. <<

This way of selecting remedies via EAV is alien to homeopathy. In homeopathy it is the signs and symptoms alone , which govern the selection of a remedy, not any EAV testing.

My personal advice is to take your ‘’homeopaths’’ shrugging of shoulders as: ‘’I don’t know what’s going on and I don’t know what to do.’’

In this instant, you should find a homeopath that is known to work in line with homeopathic rules and principles. He / she will take your case in detail, and besides advising you on dietarian and habitual matters will also select a remedy suitable to remove your ailment.

For those who aspire to become a homeopath here are the paragraphs from the Organon concerning this matter: 249, 250, 252, 255-261, 167, 170, 183, also 180 and 195 .

On the matter of carcinosum
As in Divina’s link already stated carcinosum (Nelson) is a combination remedy.
On request, Nelson was unable to name the donors and the time when these samples were taken.
This combination remedy was never proven, nor is the source traceable in that sense, that in case this remedy gets lost or destroyed, it can be reproduced in an identical way.
But this is a pivotal point in homeopathy:
WE HAVE TO BE SURE, THAT THE REMEDY WE USE IS IDENTICAL TO THE ONE PROVED.
Otherwise every proving becomes meaningless.

Regards provings of Carcinosum:
There has been a partial proving by Templeton 1956, which was published, in the British journal.
The latest proving { 2003 ] was undertaken by a student-group under the supervision of Dr. U. Friedrich and B. Viereck / Heidelberg, Germany, and is published in the ZKH 1/2003. Again, this latest proving is incomplete, but the source of the material is clear in this trial.

Being conscious of the dangers giving advice on health matters, I felt obliged to highlight the earlier shortcomings in the interest of all serious homeopaths, their patients and all the other sufferers yet to discover homeopathy.