Well, this is a rather massive assumption you're presenting, Kasaur.
You're making all kinds of conclusions about the way this homeopath took the case, analyzed the case, and prescribed the remedy. To say that all homeopaths experiment with Carcinosin, and all homeopaths prescribe it based on not taking a full case, is utter nonsense.
So is the "advice" given to stop the remedy...when absolutely no information about the case has been given to you.
Kasaur Naheed, you've given us a TON of evidence here to judge exactly who is guilty of "experimentation" on a patient, and prescribing without taking a case...and it's clear the guilty party is not the homeopath who is treating this patient.
__________________
...and deliverance has many faces<br />but grace<br />is an aquaintance of mine
|