CCH,
[quote]Tim:
I don't want to impose anything on you. Just looking for the ONE truth...can't be two truths.
Hahnemann's "allopaths" no longer exist. The word doesn't even exist outside Homeopathy.[/b]
Quote:
|
CCH:Yes, there can be several truths in simultaneous existence--and perhaps you'd better consider the validity of your own "sacred" and threatened truth in light of the other ones.
|
Example, please, of several truths. What truth of mine are you referring to?
Quote:
|
Yes, Hahnemann's "allopaths" do, in fact, exist. They may be using different "substances", but the methods and the mindset exist today absolutely unchanged. "Same ****, different year"...I'm sure you've heard that somewhat fitting phrase. It applies here beautifully.
|
I didn't know what "allopath" meant until I read the Organon. Nobody I know knew the term either.
Why might that be?
Quote:
|
"Allopathy" does in fact exist as a word completely outside of homeopathy. It existed as a word in medicine before Hahnemann, and it exists as a word after him too. It is absolutely NOT a word only homeopaths use. I daresay there are a vast number of medical historians who are very familiar with the word as well...and who may know little about homeopathy as a specific medical system.
|
I note how you never give examples supporting your statement. Allopathy, like virtually all English words, has an origin going back centuries.
Tim