It is written to give second dose only after the action of first dose is completed. If the good affect of first dose is still there ,no need to give another dose. If the patient is better and the action of first dose is completed,there is no need to go higher, we can repeat the same dose and wait until the good affect last. If there is no reaction even after repeating the former dose, which has done good in past, you can go for next potency.

That was the paragraph on which Richy first agreed and said I agree TOTALLY with this paragraph and then she did not go to sleep. she thought and thought and then she came back and edit her post again after many hours of frusted thoughts. Look at her she in her later comments TOTALLY neglected everything which she TOTALLY agreed first.

O.k I will ask these new questions in another way.

Is this first paragraph not applicable on LM of homeopathy as you pointed out

Yes or No

Is the paragraph not applicable if a pateint has come after the use of allopathic medication, as you said

Yes or No

You said every case is individual and generalization can not be given. Is this paragraph not applicable in each individual cases of homeopathy

Yes or No

[ 18. May 2003, 19:55: Message edited by: Secret Agent ]