In India and Pakistan many homeopaths which claim to be classical homeopaths are watching 100 patients per day. If you could calculate their average time then they are sparing five minutes per patient if a single homeopath works continuously eight hours with out break (which is absolutely not possible).

When according to Kent, one single chronic case might need 6 to 7 years for cure. Another view is, a chronic miasm cannot be cured.

Some of the members are giving this impression that it is always not necessary to take full case, in connection to their own thought they quote from Hering sayings “if you have the three-legged stool, mind, likes and dislikes and concomitants, you can make a successful prescription.”

If this statement is correct then Indian and Pakistani homeopaths are not doing wrong thing. But the amazing thing is that they also claim that their patients are getting cure. I am confused.

There is much confrontation, one is saying I generally take an hour or more per patient and on the other hand other said I take five minutes on a case. Then both claim for cure in their patient. What is name of this gibberish attribute?

__________________
Principal
Prof Dr. Arshad Sheikh, M.Sc, DHMS, RHMP
Government Zamindar Degree Science Collge, G.T Rd
Visiting Prof, Tahir Homeopathic Medical College.