There is a TON, literally, of good science which verifies homeopathic efficacy.

There is also a ton of very poor "science" which attempts to show how useless homeopathy is by using the remedies as if they were allopathic drugs.

Well, if we used allopathic drugs incorrectly, they would never work (Heck, they hardly work when used correctly). The trick is to know the difference between a valid study, with solid principles and practices controlled as variables; and a study which attempts to just trick people into believing homeopathy doesn't work by misusing the principles and the method and the remedies.

Truth is, homeopathy works very well. It is the only effective cure for asthma. When people who are cured of asthma or other "incurable" diseases by homeopathy, they tell others, and so on, and so on. That's why homeopathy is so widely used, no matter what shabby "science" tries to do to its reputation.

Wouldn't it be nice to see an actual, good scientific study of homeopathy's efficacy printed here--instead of one which looks like it was reproduced here to just stir up ****?

__________________
...and deliverance has many faces<br />but grace<br />is an aquaintance of mine