otherhealth.com - View Single Post

Hans Weitbrecht · #55 (**permalink**) 25th March 2003, 08:18 PM

Dear drleela and other members

>>What is a ‘’more striking, singular, uncommon and peculiar symptom in this case?<<
Example:
If every time during the attack the patient would have a headache which is < moving the eyes.
This would be quite uncommon to a suffocative attack.
Likewise the CHANGE in mood while having a suffocative attack goes under the par.: 153.
Example:
The person in question is usually rather anxious, but with the attack gets really bold.

So- not in every case can we find these 153 symptoms.

To your second question about the use of concordances:
Take the article on the BB-website as the basis.

In the situation of a follow-up remedy this works in the following way:
A—for cases where the main-symptom has changed: No use of the Concordances, just select on the now present symptom-picture the next remedy.

B – where the main-symptom remains the same, but some modalities, sensations or concommittant symptoms have changed which lie outside the sphere of action of the previously applied remedy, so that a straight repetition would not benefit the case, there the concordances are used in the following way:
Eliminate with the rubric relating to the area of the main-symptom, which has not changed from the concordances of the remedy previously administered –provided the remedy has shown curativeness. Run against it the rubrics from the other areas not changed of this remedy, then add the changed things from the main repertory to your repertorisation. This narrows down your selection to a small number of remedies, which should be compared first between the case now and the MMP. Often one finds exactly the remedy useful now. This approach also helps a lot in the ongoing treatment of psora, where often a series of different remedies --one after another-- is necessary to effect cure.