HAns,
I've seen various explanations on how to study the MAteria MEdica during our training.
BUT We were not told to study it using the BB repertory to map out the characteristic symptoms. This is an interesting way.
Does this then give CLinical importance to the MAteria MEdica Symptom, this method of Study?
Also I'm slightly blurred on why your way of prescription is termed HAhnemanian or Boeger Boenninghausan's method. IT is the method we're always taught to use in cases at the beginning. LAter when one has this ability to prescribe, then we also start looking at other "modern" ways of analysis and interpreting the patients history. At least that is the way I learnt it.
OF course in clinical practice one then just uses what comes most easily, and from experience.
Could you tell us what exactly is the Boeger Boenninghausan method? IS it the use of the BB Repertory?
I ask this becasue I went through some of the Boennighausan cases in some archives and I don't think I would have prescribed very differently in those cases.
doctorleela
[ 13. March 2003, 14:38: Message edited by: doctorleela ]
|