Thankyou very much for admiting all these things. "
I am not homeopath". This the most simple answer to get rid off from non-sense funny stories which you commonly put on this bb. You start like a genius and then some one with very low common sense respond logically then it is the best way to come out from the track by saying that "
I am not homeopath".
This kind of habit we have observed so many times from many members including those who are still discussing and appreciating on your lie story. This is not the way to give credit to homeopathy. Bye doing so you and members like you are not doing sympathy with homeopathy. You know many non-homeopaths are also reading this general discussion forum. What will they think. As seelishah very rightly pointed out here.
For Non- Homeopaths,
Let’s repertorize the case once again for studying point of view!
According to your opinion it was sudden loss of vision due to missing of friend cat
1. My point is Arnica does not come under this category or it does not have sudden blindness symptoms or any other symptom, so it has no link with this case. If you or your care take has used it then it was all-ineffective.
You prescribed aconite and nat mur and did not wait
2. Aconite has duration of action from 1 hour to several weeks. It means when you prescribed arnica. Aconite was in cat’s body and its action was going on in cat’s circulatory system. You also given Nat mur. It’s duration of action is 40-50 days. When arnica was given it was also in its body.
3. In my opinion the cause of sudden loss of vision was not known to you. It was your opinion that the cat was missing her friend but actually it was not.
Arnica is the complementary remedy to aconite in bruises or injury to eye. It acts well after the administration of aconite. When you prescribed arnica it might complete the action of aconite. Am I right? 
The problem was started before 02 Jan 2003 and you gave first dose to cat at 06 Jan 2003, almost after a week after the start of problem
4. According to NASH, when the case is old arnica works well in high potency, it should not be given in cut, abrasion and wound in low potency in early stages of the case. The case was almost a week old. So you can’t expect or take best result in low potency in this case.
5. In sudden loss of vision, if you put delay in treating your patient. It will never recover. You generally have very short time to think. You lost too many days in your first prescription.
Issue of Fatty tissue in sudden blindness
Never think about fatty tissue involvement in sudden blindness. It never comes suddenly.
Cat care taker started dosing arnica on 9 jan 2003. Doses were given almost three days.
Eye’s cells need more time to recover once gone in blindness then the other body cells. The credit was given to Arnica which needs approx a week or so. It was not arnica who brought vision back rather it was duration of time which is needed to a body’s immune and natural healing system to respond. Secondly aconite acted as catalyst and played rule in enhancing speedy recovery. Arnica does not fit properly or no more near to this case.
Arnica is the complementary remedy to aconite in bruises or injury to eye. It acts well after the administration of aconite. When you prescribed arnica it might complete the action of aconite. Am I right?
Your care taker also used antibiotics and other medicines at the same time. How could you say the cat has recovered after the use of arnica and not from aconite, nat mur and antibiotics
This is not the way to give credit to homeopathy?
I am astonised to read in pet's forum where members are appreciating on fake and funny story.
Another thing I observed cat was not treat in front of carol even then members are foring her to put this funny cure in cured cases. This also tells the criteria of cured cases already have in HHBB. 
Carol for Bhagwan sake don't put it in cured cases box.
[ 09. February 2003, 21:28: Message edited by: DR.SAM ]