1) Dear Ladies,

It seems this is to be a complete HHBB day for me: I only wanted to have a quick look for answers to my previous posts, but keep stumbling from one thread to the next because all relate to things I have been researching recently, and I feel I should give them these pieces of information.

So it's Ca also today...

- Since you wished for some plain facts, I give you some, plus my sources so you can assess for yourself ( as I would want myself, too, not to buy any wonder story ). I have been researching these recently for a private seminar with Dr. Leela ( greetings to her especially ! ). So here is some:

- Chances for success in homoeo-ca treatment are, of course: the earlier started, the better.

- Ca treatment is pretty much the highest level, most difficult thing you can get.

- Patients have been cured - and I mean actually cured, not just palliated or somewhat improved - by purely classical homoeopathic treatment AFTER being given up by the allopaths when they had spend all their ammunition, so many rounds, and they looked terrible indeed....
And it IS documented, according to all standarts of professional western medicine, and published in medical literature. In fact I found that in the library of a large University of good repute. - So much to your "have still to see...".
But that were specialists, and these are their own peak successes.

- As Dr Leela has outlined, the described case is quite an advanced one.
I have read convincing cases
- with returning breast ca cured, after previous surgery failed ( of course ) to achieve that, in a below-forty woman
- with metastases, but in a young male patient, don't remember which part was affected.

But have also read a breast ca case, where treatment provided relief for a while, and when metstases were found that marked the beginning of the end. Though my impression there was that the homoeopath made several mistakes, plus he got the case very late.

I have not yet heard of a case like yours that was healed; but also would not completely rule that out.

- I agree with Dr Leela that her's was a brave fight.

- However, since you may, some of you, also encounter other cases, hopefully at an earlier stage, where additional knowledge may prove invaluable, I give you some more details than I would have for this case alone:

- I know a homoeo-lady who did her MD thesis research on comparative Ca treatment research. She told me her findings clearly were that surgery is a disservice to the patients: Don't cut away ! It is that simple.
All homoeo-ca-literature that I heard of agreed that surgery was a nightmare also for the therapist, because it robs you of the opportunity to watch the results of your treatment, so you are essentially fighting in the fog there.

- Radiation is brutal for the patient. You have to spend time first on healing demage done by that with appropriate remedies, before you can proceed.

- However, quote a doctor who has himself treated quite a number of ca cases:
"chemo is no problem". I know that many "homoeopaths" would hate to hear that ( but then ask them for THEIR ca treatment experience please ! ). I am also convinced that there will be side-effects, and that you can successfully treat by homoeopathy alone.
But you have to do a sober calculation. What is going to kill them is that damned ca, and with the allo-ca-medicine and good class. homoeo-treatment side by side the statistics are best, going by those experienced physicians that I learned this from.

[ 12. May 2003, 10:41: Message edited by: panthera-non-onca ]