This is a quote from a member who does not belong to homeopathy by profession 
I don't know who is she?
Quote:
|
Well said, Shirley. So, now, can everyone stop with this foolishness about making Peter Chappell out to be a big greedy charlatan? It smacks of sour grapes...particularly because it comes mainly from people who are threatened by him or are thoroughly incapable of doing the kind of work he's successful in--healing the sick, particularly people so sick no one else in the world wants to help them.
|
I agree with her as she does not belong to homeopathy. So I fully support her desire for sick.
She does not know that there are so many many medicines which iare equally effective against HIV/AIDS but she always objected and rejected those medicines.The most probable reason of her rejection was those inventor does not belong to homeopathic world. She really objected their inventions by declaring that these are not homeopathic.
She has the habit of saying these remedies are suppressive in nature. Hahnemann was against those medicine which were supressive in nature, if not prepared by applying homeopathic aphorisms.
She has the habit of presenting objection if a person speaks against homeopathic rules. Now she has no objection against peter's medicine when everybody is saying and confirming that he does not follow any homeopathic rule or aphorism. But she is supporting him. The reason is quite clear, she has limited knowledge over homeopathy by profession.
I will again say
we support rules according to our own wishes and desires. If we like something we support them without following ruels. It is totally our liking and disliking which actually play role for deciding right or wrong thing.
Now I hand over my mic to homeoman to get log on and speak up.....
and tell us your views about new invention which neither homeopathic or allopathic but actually hermaphrodite (having both sexes)