View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 17th January 2003, 01:00 PM
meena meena is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Global Village
Posts: 75
meena
Cool

Prime Doctor,

After reading your entire posts, you compelled me to get log on and offer notes. I just cannot remain spectator on your posts without offering my hearty comments. It is my consolidated reply on your posts.

My dear members!

I think the inventor of the medicine is trying to get advantage of homeopathic shelter for his legal protection. His medicine does not belong to homeopathy. Although the inventor has linked his medicine with homeopathic world. He actually wants to use the name of homeopathy and is taking advantage of that.

If you read entire comments of Shirley Recishman which offered on various posts then you will come to know that she is trying hard to protect homeopathic principles and its laws. According to my gathered comprehension, she has the opinion that if peter’s medicine fulfils the criteria of homeopathic rules or if he has prepared his medicine by applying homeopathic principles then there is no option left for us for not adopting or accepting that medicine in our routine practice but before accepting and starting practice that medicine. We should be very clear about our concern over the newly discovered medicine. I think if I am right in generalizing her points then she is absolutely right in her respectful opinion.

I think no principle; rule and laws of homeopathy were followed in making and applying that medicine. The inventor actually wants to sell his product by all means and hence the inventor is trying to protect against legal laws by declaring his research product belongs to homeopathy but actually it does not. [img]redface.gif[/img]

It is also my opinion that the inventor very cleverly tried to merge the homeopathic principles with his newly invented medicine just to show that his medicine belongs to homeopathy. He did not follow the rules and principles. So I cannot stand with her and also cannot support him.

I accept that what inventor has said about the effectiveness of his medicine is right. His medicine has good result on AIDS but I openly say that his medicine is not homeopathic and he did not follow any rule of homeopathy as exposed by prime doctor.
__________________
<b>Lady Dr. Meena</b>
Reply With Quote