In my experience inside of homeopathy I was able to observe the
existence of an inverse relation between the degree of knowledge of a
homeopath and the number of cured cases that he achieve or obtain in
their clinical practice. While some assure they cure many and many of
their patients, others really more serious and wiser, recognize that
their successes are very limited, and that in their daily practice they
donīt even reach 2% of the similar remedies.
As a believer of the human being I donīt think the first are lying or
giving malicious data or information, at least mostly of them, but I
think there is a difference of criterion in relation to whatīs to cure?
means.
Is here that I would like to share with you these considerations about
health, starting with their other face, to which maybe all of us are
more familiar, I mean, the disease.
What`s disease?
In homeopathy, we can say that disease is the disequilibrium or
energetic unbalance experienced by a human being, which inhibits him
from realization. Or, in another words, the break they have that
inhibits him to go to a higher place of the existence in a way of
well-being and feeling, well thinking and well acting, as said
Hahnemann. This is in synthesis the concept of disease, which we can
more or less manage, and to which we must add that very important nuance
of our medicine that is the individuality.
It is enough to a good observer, to be advised to what is the disease,
how much differenced the human being is from their fellow-creatures,
representing that individuality their particular unbalance or
disequilibrium.
Each pathogenesis is an individuality expressed to their maximum in a
real picture. It is as if the disequilibrium was located in an initial
point from which all of us could depart, and like small streams spilling
from that initial point, each one of us individualized the disease,
being as much ill, as farther we are from the other human beings.
Is here that we separate from the single. But maybe I am wrong and there
is not agreement in relation to this my definition of disease even
between the homeopaths, I invite you to a healthy discussion in relation
to this, assured as I am that I will learn very much from you, and by
this reason I will receive even more than I am giving.
While this does not happen, I?ll still continue with my reflections.
If the disease is that energetic unbalance, which predisposition is an
implicit part of the human being that inhibits him from reaching the
higher purposes of the existence, we can then say that the disease
cannot be these symptoms which are manifested by that unbalance, I mean,
the organic affection, but something more transcendent, or something
that this organic affection would try to equilibrate or balance at their
particular, individual and idiosyncratic way.
The really disease, is by the way I can see it, the deep suffering that
the confronting with their existential loneliness could cause in the
human being. In form of symptoms, their behavior in face to the life, a
wrong way, a failed tentativeness to palliate the anguish produced by
the knowledge of their deviation from the Total Unity, the confronting
with himself, and his obscured loneliness.
In terms of the Kentiano scientist Dr. Masi Elizalde, the man envies God their
Quality and is punished in his arrogance, lacking the envied attribute.
This way each individual would be attracted by a facet of God that has
been denied to him to let him understand the big lesson of humbleness
pending from processing in every human being.
Is due to this concept that the studies of the Materia Medica done by
the followers of Dr. Masi, use the relate of the first man and the first
woman in the Paradise of the earth, an idyllic place where they lived
with the father, protected and loved as only God can do.
Done the sin of wanting be like God, the man has condemned himself to
the dram of the expulsion from the Paradise, meaning the expulsion from
the loved arms of the entity who gave him the life and their habitat.
There, roving and looking for the redemption of their punishment, with
the nostalgia of the loosed protection, the man struggles with their
disease, which by this point of view is present at the metaphysical
level.
The envy that makes a man to put poison in the food of lots of children,
the attack until killing a roving by a skin head (Neo-Nazi) A shooter
who kills 10 people, the highway of the drug addiction, the active or
incited violence, the arrogance, the abuse of a weak person... are all
examples of the diseases very well defined and extreme. Guilty, fear,
moral pain, are in a different order manifestations of the same
unbalance, and this way we can see that the disease is not out of our
bodies. The disease is inside of us, more or less latent, more or less
disguised.
The inverse way leads us to the health, since the individuality to the
Whole, since the existence to the essence. As individual as is the
disease, is the movement to the health, because the man will need to go
back through the same steps in order to reach the balance. Is their most
similar remedy, that is the only able to initiate that movement.
The similars, the Allium Cepa, the specific, the acute remedies... all
of them will act against the smoking signs, but not against the centre
of the disease. It is as if we confuse the name of a city with the city
itself. The plate signing the way to the city may be located a several
Kilometers from the city itself and is nothing else than a sign invoking
the place, but is not the city.
Only when we can see a similar cure, we may know that a true cure has
happened. After this experience is reached a first time, it could be
difficult to afford a different thing than the same, the prescription of
the similimum. But the search for the similimum is not an easy job, you
can say; including the most orthodox Kentish prescribe their patients
with several remedies. Is right, they donīt know how to find the true
simillimum at the first time, but they do not recognize it, they know,
but still looking for the ideal, given remedies they think are the
similimum, one and another time again.
Whatīs the difference? The homeopaths of similars get happy with the
results, the Homeopaths of the similimum still searching for it. The
homeopaths of similars have big quantities of ?cures?, the homeopaths of
the similimum know that are just a small quantity of patients for which
they can find the similimum. We lack homeopaths of the similimum, the
world asks for them in order that the obscure reality of an unjust world
of suffering men and women, may be able to change. We have all
responsibility in it, the homeopaths to point to a higher degree, the
patients to demand it.
|