Dear Chris:

Your response only addressed one statement I made out of many. I guess I can only conclude that nothing I had to say was of interest to you as you must be curing the majority of your chronic cases which is great. I am very interested in hearing success rates of many homeopaths and what method they use to find out who has the best method of case taking and analysis, which to me can only be based on their success rate. Again, the proof is always in the pudding. I also made it clear it is important to UNDERSTAND the principals but did note in the end as I beleive you agreed, curing patients is the ultimate desired consequence.

My only interest in all of this is to find if in fact Herscu, or whom ever, clearly has a better understanding of the principals in application and a success rate to back it up as many people are not getting results close to Herscu. If I can find more people who are highly successful compared to others and look at their methods and eventually publish some of my findings, it may help practitioners who struggle much more than they should. Especially some that are being poorly trained by people who are considered to be some of the best homeopaths. This concerns me greatly and should concern everyone who has an interst in the truth instead of their own agenda.

sincerely,

John Oljace