I agree Denise,
The college and thriving homeoapthic hospital where I studies has all types of homeopathic practitioners - and a wide variety of practicing methods and techniques. We had the opportunity to learn/see most of them.
Kents, Boger- Boenninghausens, Iscador (esp cancer), Dhawle's, Keynote prescription, Specific prescriptions, Consitutional prescribing, alternate prescriptions (!), Miasmatic prescriptions. I'd rather not be the judge of who is right and who is wrong based on fixed ideas. Though I do flinch at some of them.
But suffice to say, the hospital runs to a full OPD daily, the patients continue to increase in number and more and more are relieved of their suffering. So who is a better homeopath than whom, who's method is correct or wrong, who follows the principles (which ones) or not is always a big question.
I don't think I'm in any place to criticise anyone. Each will be judged by their fruits!
Most important of all as you mentioned,"isn't it true that Hahnemann himself never considered the exploration of Homeopathy finished?"
Regards,
doctorleela
|