<This post is from Albert>

Homeopathy does NOT have "it's [sic] foundations in ancient Ayurveda" or Ayurvedya, vidya or vedya being ancient Sanskrit for "knowledge or understanding."

In fact, they have nothing whatsoever to do with each other except that they both existed in the ancient Rama Empire, which is today, by ignorant academic fools, called the Harappan Culture of the Indus Valley.

The man refers to a remark in the multi-volume BHAGWAT PURANA (within which are the UPANASHDS, the BAVAGHAT GITA, the MAHA-BHARATA and other less famous works generically called the "Nacaal Writings" from the Nagas) that very clearly indicates awareness of ALL four Laws of Therapeutics invoked in a single sentence.

But that only proves that the Nagas or Sanskrit writers knew about homeopathy, possibly or probably from the ancient Egyptian's having it as Hermetic medicine; it does not mean that the disreputable system of SECRET medical knowledge (we have always been opposed to this since allopathic practices have their socio-economic basis in secret nostrums) about COMBINATION HERBS (a direct violation of the Law of the Single Remedy) called Ayurveda preceded homeopathy.

They have NOTHING to do with each other.

Argh...

The man is clearly sincerely motivated to do good, and this is laudable, but such misrepresentations of fact are unacceptable when they involve homeopathy.

Albert, also
Hahnemannian444
#5904