Snoopy

Your reply appears to have nothing to do with my question to Ricky about automatically assuming a remedy is palliative. What is your point?

My response to Ricky was that one shouldn't ignore Symphoricarpus because someone once said it was palliative.

If it works and the symptoms match, and no other "new" symptoms appear, then it is the correct remedy, no? And, if no "new" symptoms have appeared then its not damaging (because if you are not repeating it then you are not setting off down the route to a proving).

Although some might say, that if "new" symptoms do appear, they may be indicative of the "right" remedy.

__________________
Regards,<br /><b>Simone H</b><br /><br /><i>Aude Sapere</i><br /><br />"Never be a passive listener or learner" ~ Christian Gottfried Hahnemann