Thanks Nigel...very interesting.

I do want to stress - that the advice given to me, by my homeopath - was about Radionics in general; not specifically to do with Hulda Clarke's method (Hulda's book, which was in my possession, was simply the catalyst to our discussing the whole subject. In fact, I didn't realise that her method had anything, remotely, to do with Radionics until we talked about it).

I just wonder how much research is being done - - after affects, side-affects, etc...
One of the people who died - was deeply interested in Radionics (was a homeopath as well) and used it for over 25 years (as knowledge about it unfolded) - was heavily using it on his/her patients'. Maybe his/her case was 'too experimental' to be curative in any way. Dunno really. But, I think I'll personally yield to her advice until I can better understand how it works (vs. Hulda's method, which I do understand). In fact, I think I'll stick with Homeopathy.

The sad thing to me is - that so many people are interested in Homeopathy and yet there are sooooo few competent practitioners (well, they seem to be outnumbered by the one's who dabble in this and that).

Best wishes,
Lisa

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham