I wonder then if Medorrhinum causes gonorrhoea, or Syph causes syphilis, or Tub causes tuberculosis?

I think this is most definitely "rubbish", as a remedy cannot cause pathology, only symptoms resembling the pathology. Considering the fact that we don't really know what causes cancer, how on earth can they say a remedy has done so. This sounds like sensationalist homoeopathy-bashing to me.

Having said that, it is possible that a nosode may aggravate an already existing state - Tub may activate latent tuberculosis, Med will recreate on old discharge etc. This might be mistaken for "creating" the disease, but the disease would have already been there. Modern medicine of course does not understand this, and would interpret it quite differently.

__________________
David Kempson.<br />Dip.Homoeopathic Medicine.<br />Lecturer Australian College of Natural Therapies (Brisbane Campus)<br />Member AHA, AROH, HMA<br />Member Australian Homoeopathic Association. Member#0442.