I agree with you Caludia.
Louise, that was funny, really!
Well I think provings are getting a bit strange. But if I understand Snakaran, I know these approaches are experimental on his part. His mind is constantly searching. ITs us who put him on an infallible pedestal, take eveything he says as homeopathic law and he has cautioned people about doing it at ALL his seminars and lectures in college too.
Scholton's brilliance and interpretations are something wonderful. Also he has not said that his book or understanding is unfallible. In fact he has requested ALL of us, that if we have used his suggestions to help out a case and have been successful, he would like to have the details of that case as "CLINICAL Proving", which I believe is fair enough. And He is ready to make changes if things are proved otherwise.
Boericke, that we all refer too, is made up of all clinical symptoms. Do you expect the normal provings process to produce the pathological symptoms that he has included? Yet we refer to him and prescribe without questionning. So I think Scholton should be given his opportunity to do this.
Regards,
Docotrleela
[ 22 January 2002: Message edited by: doctorleela ]</p>
|