View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 14th February 2004, 03:27 AM
sreischman's Avatar
sreischman sreischman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,428
sreischman is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

I agree with ntpathy. It would take a homeopath who is extremely skilled and also very familiar with oncology. I have had very good results treating for any side effects of the allopathic treatment and then doing constitutional treatment for several years following and have not had any reoccurrences. In one case that was terminal, I was able to greatly improve the quality of life and and his life was extended substantially beyond the prognosis, but who knows, maybe that would have happened even without homeopathy. The quality of life issues, though, were the direct result of homeopathy. One case that refused allopathic treatment did not do well, although I think I slowed the progression. All the other cases were working with an oncologist and came to me for adjunct treatment during and after allopathic treatment, and they all did well, better than the oncologists expected.
__________________
Shirley Reischman
Reply With Quote