What I have found difficult to understand is how very few 'classical only' homoepaths seem to have any knowledge of real cures by other methods. Now I see that it is perhaps because the question is framed in such a way that one could not possibly find any evidence to the contrary. How could your belief ever be challenged? This is exactly like the psychoanalysts in the community of psychologists and psychotherapists I have come from. One way the only way, psychoanalysis - and yet how many people do they actually cure on a day to day basis? How sad to find homoeopathy as closed to other possibilities as the allopaths are to us.