I have had a few cases like that, as you sometimes see in advanced untreated diabetes. After the first dose of the remedy little tissue change was visible, even though the patient made good progress. the second dose afetr about 8 weeks, brought also gradual tissue change for the better.The kidneys were seen to repair themselves. It took however over 3 years for the kidneys to be fifty percent active and healthy, while the rest was mainly scar tissue. However, the function was as if normal kidneys were there. Hence we see that in such cases the functional restoration takes priority for the body, while the restoration of the structure seems to be secondary to that. After all, you can lead a perfectly healthy life with 1 kidney, hence with 50% less function or structure.
I hope this sort of thing was what you are looking for. I think it is Stuart Close, who says that the presence of a lesion or even a tumour, says little about the health of the patient, especially after the remedy. He also opines that surgical removal is in such cases preferable, but I beg to differ. I think the use of the knife can and should be avoided as much as possible.