Hahnemannian, try this one for starters

"Tachyons are theorized "phantom photos" [edit to: "phantom photons"] said to "accompany photons" or light particles. That's a mistake. They don’t accompany light particles; they are the same substance, only they’re out of phase or not en rapport with themselves as photons due to their nutating [sic] at a higher rate on a consequently higher plane of existence than their positions as quantum particles of electromagnetic radiation, but they all coincide in exactly the same space"

Nice statement. Now where is your evidence for this? Empty speculation is not good enough. If it's a mistake you need empirical evidence or a mathematically coherent (absence of hyphen, thanks for the grammar lesson) disproof of the principle you claim is a mistake. Do you have either or is this just more windy clever-sounding (note correct use of hyphen) rhetoric from the world of pseudoscience? Don't be afraid to use proper mathematical formalisms I can always get it checked later if it's more than I can manage.