Ricky, you can see how it must be frustrating for GM when he sees questionners being badly advised, especially after he has given his expert opinion on a matter.

There's years of study in what he knows and to find his sharing of that hard-won knowledge challenged by a homoeopath fresh out of college or by anyone with less knowledge, is bound to be annoying.

GM re-established my belief that homoeopathy can be an exact, dependable and reliable form of healing. Not some kind of wishy-washy hit-and-miss procedure bordering on psychology made into an art form.

He defends not only his opinion but the accurate prescription he has offered to the patient. So it's for the patient's sake too that the defence is so robust.